The Democratic ship is going down. Trumpism has replaced the GOP of two decades ago. Wall Street is quietly still at the helm.
What is to be done?
Well, it won’t be done by DSA or the 4th International, and it won’t be the terminally maximalist and sectarian Greens, so we can table that bullshit.
A US Popular Party (or whatever you’d want to call it) would need to do several things very differently than either of the current Parties. First and foremost, it would need to strictly limit its platform to no more than a dozen key national issues with which candidates must agree across the board, and leave all other issues to candidates themselves, so they can tailor their campaigns to respond to their own constituencies. Secondly, it would have to impose a strict code of conduct its own institutional structures and all its candidates/elected officials. Finally, it would need a lean, mean publicity/ground game organization to which virtually all its resources would flow. (In other words, its leadership should have enough integrity to reject unethical temporary advantages in favor of doing the right thing.)
It would take no position (in its platform) on guns, abortion, etc., though its individual candidates would be free to advocate whatever they wanted in that regard. A firewall would be placed between the party’s limited stated objectives (all majoritarian) and other issues, which candidates could then ignore, support, or reject locally.
Such a formation would be clear from the outset, and reiterate as often as a twelve-step group opening its meetings with the Serenity Prayer that the Party’s goal is twofold: to adhere to its twelve (my number) issue-positions and its Code of Conduct, and to win elections without big money and without sectarian squabbling.
Code of Conduct
The personal is the political (not in the original sense). Crackpots, perverts, the sexually incontinent, active addicts, people seeking attention by being as bizarre as possible, narcissists, thieves, and opportunists cannot be leaders, full stop. Leadership requires sobriety, good character, sound judgement, and humility.
Taking corporate (or super-rich individual’s) money is taboo. Money is an exchange medium, not a ticket into the backroom.
No big salaries, period. No exceptions.
Equivocating to tactically avoid difficult questions is anathema. Speak directly and defend your position reasonably.
Never run from a debate.
Never, ever punch down.
Issues
Money and Politics
Small Donor Public Financing
End All Foreign Spending
Strict Spending Limits
Easily Accessible Public Records of All Campaign Donations/Draconian Prosecution of Shadow Financing
Federal Jobs Guarantee Program (and National Service System)
Military
Civilian Conservation
Disaster Relief Task Force
Water
Watershed Authorities
Water Protection
Potable Water Project
Aquifer Protection
Water Democracy
Water Recreation
Economy
Abolition of the Federal Reserve Bank/Glass-Steagall Plus (Rentier Repression)
Banking as Public Utility
Money Creation Reform (not through loans, but through public employment)
Minimum Wage ($25/hr)
Maximum Salary ($250,000/yr)
Price Controls (no profit beyond 10% of overhead)
Tax the Rich (50%/$1 million; 10% more for each additional million, up to 90%; 60% capital gains tax)
Outlaw Derivatives Trade
Jubilee
National Debt Forgiveness Program (all interest forgiven)
Abolish Compound Interest
Administrative Reform (project/result driven nor process driven, “progressive” deregulation)
Single Payer Health Care
Basic Care
No Elective Care
Federal Pharmaceutical Oversight
Housing
Rent Control
Price Control (Bubble Control—no Derivatives)
Repair/Recycle Unused Stock
War and Foreign Policy
Reform War Powers Act
Withdrawal/Consolidation
End Cost-Plus Contracting
Prohibit Mercenaries
Index Military Retirement to Current Pay Scales
Diplomatic Corps Reform
Democracy Agenda
End the Electoral College
Comprehensive Biannual Census
Abolish All Gerrymandering
Expand and Democratize the Senate (two minimum, with an additional Senator for each two million in population) Wyoming, Vermont, Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho, Nebraska, West Virginia, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, 2 each; New Mexico, Mississippi, Kansas, Arkansas, Nevada, Iowa, Utah, Connecticut, 3 each; Oklahoma, Oregon, Kentucky, Louisiana, South Carolina, Minnesota, Colorado, Wisconsin, 4 each; Maryland, Missouri, Indiana, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Arizona, Washington, 5 each; Virginia, New Jersey, 6 each; Michigan, North Carolina, Georgia, Ohio, 6 each; Illinois, Pennsylvania, 7 each; New York, 10; Florida, 11; Texas, 15; California, 19.
National Holiday for General Elections
Automatic Voter Registration
Ballot Access (2% of registered voters to first qualify, 5% of vote to remain)
Supreme Court Term Limits (10 years)
Agricultural/Environmental Reform
Subsidize the Transition (with priority to carbon-economy states)
End Agricultural Dumping
Incentivize Local Consumption
Federal High Speed Rail Project
Energy Conservation/Transition (in conjunction with Federal Jobs Program)
That’s enough . . . thoughts?
this is really good stan. much of it, or so it seems to me, would 'disperse' power and thereby enable more locally and regionally organized 'participation'. maybe this is too particular an item to add, but 'right to repair' legislation should be an 'objective' if not a 'platform' item
Great ideas, but they'll never happen. Hate to be the fly in the ointment, since I agree with these proposals overall.
But as an activist all my life, I'm now come, at the ripe old age of 67, to be a bit more -- not cynical, exactly -- let's say pessimistic -- about the chances for major changes like this.